<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guidewire Group &#187; Vanity Fair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guidewiregroup.com/tag/vanity-fair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guidewiregroup.com</link>
	<description>Fostering a Path to Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:55:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitsville</title>
		<link>http://guidewiregroup.com/2010/01/twitsville/</link>
		<comments>http://guidewiregroup.com/2010/01/twitsville/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carlacthompson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanessa Gigoriadis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guidewiregroup.com/?p=1104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had writer&#8217;s block the past couple of days and couldn&#8217;t for the life of me come up with interesting blog content. Guess it was post-holiday fog or something. Then a few hours ago, I clicked on a link from my Austin friend Wesley Faulkner and was hit square in the face with this image. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fguidewiregroup.com%2F2010%2F01%2Ftwitsville%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fguidewiregroup.com%2F2010%2F01%2Ftwitsville%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I&#8217;ve had writer&#8217;s block the past couple of days and couldn&#8217;t for the life of me come up with interesting blog content. Guess it was post-holiday fog or something. Then a few hours ago, I clicked on a link from my Austin friend <a href="http://twitter.com/wesley83" target="_blank">Wesley Faulkner</a> and was hit square in the face with this image.</p>
<p><img src="file:///Users/carlathompson/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot.png" alt="" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/culture/2010/02/twitter-1002-01.jpg" alt="" width="376" height="312" /></p>
<p>The title of the article Wesley&#8217;s referring to? &#8220;America&#8217;s Tweethearts.&#8221; Oh this should be fun.</p>
<p>The author of this <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2010/02/twitter-201002#" target="_blank">Vanity Fair piece</a>, Vanessa Grigoriadis, seems to be living in an alternate Twitter land occupied by the sort of people who sit front and center at fashion shows. The &#8220;twitter speak&#8221; she&#8217;s throwing around is completely foreign to me. I&#8217;ve never even heard the word &#8216;twilebrity,&#8217; a concept she&#8217;s made the primary focus of the article. And &#8216;tweeple&#8217;? Seriously? Are people really saying this with a straight face?</p>
<p>The rest of the piece goes downhill from there. The five women pictured above are publicists and actresses and &#8220;social strategists&#8221; and, at least as Ms. Grigoriadis has portrayed them, have the collective depth of a frying pan. It&#8217;s an incredibly insulting, vapid piece and, were I a reader unfamiliar with Twitter, I&#8217;d run screaming from the service immediately.</p>
<blockquote><p>According to a study of 1.5 million tweets, released this year by Oxford University Press, the words “cool,” “awesome,” “wow,” and “yay” are among the most common on Twitter—and it’s a safe guess that most twilebrities use them as freely as Laguna High freshmen. Just like high school, Twitter is an enormous popularity contest.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well no, actually, it isn&#8217;t. As someone who has more than my share of issues with Twitter, I&#8217;m a little surprised at my strong reaction to this piece. Theoretically, I should be happy it&#8217;s being spun as a frivolous, shallow service. But instead, I&#8217;m annoyed that thousands of vastly more interesting people and concepts were ignored in lieu of Stefanie Michaels: &#8220;Facebook is just way too slow. I can’t deal with that kind of deep engagement.” You said a mouthful there, sister.</p>
<p>And yeah, I&#8217;ll go ahead and say it: dear GOD mainstream magazines, when will you stop being afraid of smart women? I guess was hoping that when major media decided to focus on Twitter&#8217;s mainstream adoption, it&#8217;d be a little more multi-faceted than this. But then again, I&#8217;m known for my naivete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://guidewiregroup.com/2010/01/twitsville/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

