Archive for the ‘Entrepreneurship’ Category

All posts in Entrepreneurship category.

Posted: by chrisshipley on March 25th, 2010 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations, Startups

Now that health insurance reform is out of the way (sort of), our employees in Washington (that is, Congressional reps and Senators) will surely turn their attention (if not their bipartisan cooperation) to economic stimulus and finance industry reform (get ready for Obstructionist Politics: Round 2).

Among the bits of joy in the financial reform bill proposed by the Senate Banking Committee are new guidelines for individual investors and the startups they support, guidelines that significantly and negatively impact the seed funding ecosystem.

The proposed legislation doubles the measure of net worth or income  required for an individual angel investor to be accredited, and nascent companies would be required to climb a mountain of paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission then wait up to 120 days for the SEC to review it.

These proposed rule changes throw sand into the gears of entrepreneurship and for what purpose?  If capital is not already difficult to come by for startups, this financial reform would effectively evaporate the pool of angel investment.  And while the SEC plods its way through filing reviews, time will be killing young businesses.

There are enough laws, regulations, and daily shenanigans to demonstrate that Congress hasn’t a clue about entrepreneurship.

So let’s be clear: entrepreneurship is, and always has been, the driver of the  economy.  Risk-taking individuals start new businesses, hire employees, create opportunities and build wealth that is often re-invested in local communities. Rather than imposing new regulation that makes these companies stillborn, Congress should be removing obstacles to capital.

Instead, Congress focuses on mega-banks and Fortune 500 companies, unwilling to let these leviathans of business falter.  They need to shift their attention and their policy initiatives to the Fortune 500,000 companies that are too small to be allowed to fail.  These companies employ more than 100 million people in the U.S. and earn upwards of $22T in revenue each year. Numbers, by the way, that stack up very favorably against the Fortune 500′s worldwide performance data of 24M employees and $9T in revenue).

We rarely use the Guidewire Group pulpit to incite political action, but if you’ve ever cared about an entrepreneur or imagine you might one day start a company of your own, now is the time to reach out to your elected officials and demand these onerous “reforms” be removed from the forthcoming legislation.

Posted: by chrisshipley on February 26th, 2010 | No Comments »

Categorized: Business Models, Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations

Several days later and I’m still reacting to the amazing day that was TEDxAustin.  In a day jammed with wonderful ideas, insightful speakers, engaged audience, and some stunning performances, I had the privilege of sharing one of my ideas within the event’s banner “Play Big.”

Being the contrarian I am, of course, my talk centered on the idea of remaining small.  Here’s my case:

Consider the sumo wrestler.  He’s one big boy.  Professional sumo wrestlers – of which there are 700 in Japan’s traditional training centers, or heyas - weigh in from 250 to 500 pounds.  They are very competitive in a decidedly individual competition, and while they are strong and quick in short bursts, they can be cumbersome and slow outside the ring.  Maybe most importantly, they are bound by centuries of tradition.

Now, consider the peloton.  A compact team of athletes, the peloton leverages the strength of individual members to deliver benefit to the whole.  By working together, an well-architected peloton can reduce wind drag by as much as 40% to operate with greater efficiency and greater speed.  Throughout a race, the peloton can react to changing conditions and proactively seize new opportunity.  In a word, pelotons are entreprenurial.

In the world of business, the sumo is a big company, which is resource rich, with strong brand power and great global reach.  With a rich legacy in the market, big companies – like tradition-bound sumo wrestlers – are well rooted, and while that provides great stability, it can also make change difficult for the big company.

The peloton, as you might have now guessed, is a small business.   They may well be resource constrained, but they tend to be on a first-name basis with their customers.  Small businesses have a strong connection to their local community, and yet they often play in global markets. With fewer and thinner layers of decision making, small businesses are adaptive.  They can be risk takers.  And often because of their constrained resource and their close ties with customers, small businesses must be incredibly innovative to serve their markets.

As entrepreneurs, we aspire to be big businesses.  That, after all, is what investors look for and what the public markets reward.  The Fortune 500, we often assume, are the drivers of the global economy.  In 2006, the Fortune 500 had aggregated revenues of more than $9 trillion, with profits of $610B.  With nearly 25 million employees world wide, the Fortune 500 earns $368,000 per worker.  In big energy, that number can reach as high as $1m per worker and in the retail sector it drops to about $200,000 per employee. If the Fortune 500 were a country, it would be the second largest economy in the world.

Impressive.  But let’s consider the other 29,599,500 businesses in America, business employing fewer than 500 people.  Most of these are sole proprietorship; only some 5.7M businesses have employees, but among them they employ nearly 115M workers and generate $22 trillion (yep, that’s more than 2x the Fortune 500 in the U.S. alone.) .  If you’re doing the math, that’s about $192,000 per employee.

We tend to think of big business at the head of the long tail of business.  I’d argue we turn that graph on its side.  The size of the ecosystem swirling around small business and the economic value created by it outstrips the Fortune 500.   In the U.S. alone, small business accounts for nearly half of the GDP.  Worldwide, small businesses in aggregate must certainly stand and the largest global economic force.

The entrepreneurs who start small businesses are arguably the most innovative.  Think of the market-changing, market-making innovations of the last 10 years.  Software as a Service, smart phones, eCommerce platforms and businesses, fundamental Web technologies and security systems, digital media and the DVR.  These, among many others, were developed not in big companies (in fact, many big companies failed to deliver products in these categories), but by small entrepreneurial businesses.

The irony is that the very thing that makes a big business “successful” is that thing that often prevents them from furthering their success.  Big businesses lumber under the weight of  their size, unable to move fast enough on their own.  That’s the good news for startups who become targets of acquisition, as big business consumer young companies like so many calories in order to fuel their innovation engine.

But what if there were a different model?  What if we rewarded companies not for getting big, but for being efficient engines of innovation, employment, and value creation?  Imagine for a moment the rise of the Fortune 500,000, those top small businesses that outperform the markets by performing well together, much like a peloton.

Individually, each small corporation is strong, highly adaptable, capital efficient, and profitable.  These strong businesses remain agile, able to pounce on new opportunities and deliver results without wading through layers of decision making and corporate process.

Best of all, they can easily partner with other strong small enterprises to tackle a market or create one.  Each small enterprise brings its unique and highly-tuned capability to the partnership.  At the risk of mixing my metaphors,  each small enterprise is a free atom that can bond with other organizations in a precise formula to attack a business opportunity.  They can decouple and re-attach to other organizations when new opportunities arise.

Collectively, they can be stronger and more competitive against lumbering large organizations than they ever could be on their own.  And, collectively, they can react more quickly and be more responsive to a changing market environment than large companies can.

With specialization to deliver expertise and collaboration to deliver complete market value, the peloton model of business will drive innovation and create economic value.

Whether today’s capital markets can be as reactive to this coming business change is an entirely different matter.

Posted: by chrisshipley on January 19th, 2010 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, G/Score

Last November, Guidewire Group had the opportunity to spend three amazing days with eight outstanding entrepreneurs of the 2009 PIPELINE program, as we delivered an intensive workshop of business communication.  Ours was the last of four modules in the year-long business acceleration program to provide high-potential young companies with business skills training, mentorship, and peer review and support.

During our time with the PIPELINE teams, we got to learn a lot about the program from PIPELINE CEO Joni Cobb.   Our window into the program was brief but clear: the program combines working on the business with working in the business.  The entrepreneurs are given the guidance to lead their companies more effectively and prodded the hit critical milestones precisely.  Among the many non-profit and government-funded startup accelerators we’ve studied, PIPELINE is a model to emulate.

Far away from the buzz and energy of any recognized tech center, the companies of the PIPELINE program have achieved a measure of experience and success that would set them apart and above the crowded startup landscapes around the U.S.

And did I mention, PIPELINE is in Kansas.  Not exactly the hotbed of innovation, some would say. Yet these eight companies are, simply put, inspiring.  For the most part, they’ve built their businesses with a scrappy mixture of hard work, optimism, and an exacting focus on their customers’ needs.  Few of the eight have taken professional venture capital, yet all of them present smart investment opportunity.

On Thursday night, one of them will be crowned Innovator of the Year. By any measure, it’s going to be a tough competition.  Guidewire Group wishes each of these companies best of luck at the award ceremony on Thursday, and we wish them every success in the future. (UPDATE: Farms Tech CEO Jason Tatge was named Innovator of the Year at the PIPELINE gala celebration on January 21. – ed.)

As part of our workshop, we provided a G/Score assessment for each company.  Here are the eight companies:
Emerge Medical Solutions, LLC
Lenexa, Kansas
Jerry Calovich, C0-founder

The company  has created a new and clinically proven approach to improve the quality of healthcare delivered to patients with cardiovascular disease.  Emerge Medical Solutions G/Score

EcoFit Lighting
Lenexa, Kansas
Cason Coplin, President

EcoFit Lighting designs, manufactures and markets high-output, energy-efficient LED streetlights that can be retro fit with existing utility lighting fixtures.  EcoFit Lighting G/Score.

iSi Recycling Services
Wichita, Kansas
Gary Mason, Founder & CEO

A spin out of iSi Environmental Services, this company has developed a process for creating active carbon from carbon fiber manufacturing waste.  iSi Recycling Services G/Score

Robotzone, LLC
Winfield, Kansas
Brian Pettey, Founder & CEO

Robotzone designs and develops robots and robotic components for commercial, industrial and military applications, and has developed a new robotic camera platform for the film and video industry. Robotzone G/Score

AthletixNation, Inc.
Lenexa, Kansas
Davyeon Ross,  Founder & CEO

The company  has acquired a multi-year license to publish and distribute Division I college sports video content to media properties and sports Internet sites via its multimedia content and advertising platform.  AthletixNation G/Score

BRKZ Corp.
Overland Park, KS
Chris Routh President & CEO
BRKZ creates game changing internet properties, such as   Hurox.com, a groundbreaking online social marketplace allowing talented individuals to market and sell their digitally created online content to the masses, and FreshlyBranded.com, a marketing services marketplace. FreshlyBranded.com G/Score

Orbis BioSciences
Kansas City, Kansas
Maria Stecklein, VP Business Development

Orbis Biosciences offers clients a new way to create microparticles that gives unprecedented control of release rate with any material. Orbis BioSciences G/Score

Farms Technology, LLC
Lenexa, Kansas
Jason Tatge, CEO

Based on its Dynamic Pricing Platform and Pioneer MarketPoint, the company makes commodity trading more efficient by offering automated marketing tools to farmers and grain buyers. Farms Technology G/Score

Posted: by chrisshipley on December 20th, 2009 | 8 Comments »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations, Startups

In October, I spoke at Startup Camp Montreal5 about the 10 Stupid Things Entrepreneurs Do to Mess Up Their Businesses, and alluded to that talk again recently at the Forum for Entrepreneurs and Executives conference on entrepreneurship.  It came up in conversation again on Friday so it seems high time I actually post the notes from the talk on our blog.

I hope by pointing out common blunders, I can help entrepreneurs avoid a few of the dumb mistakes that (almost) every startup makes.  I also hope that some of you who have tripped into these potholes of entrepreneurship might come forward as case studies for a collection of essays that I’m compiling.  If you have a story that serves as object lesson to fellow entrepreneurs, I’d love to talk to you about it.  I promise to protect identities (where necessary and/or requested) and to be gentle with you.  The goal of the book is to help new entrepreneurs learn from those who have gone before.   If you’re interested in sharing a story, contact me via email.

Now, on to the list of 10 Stupid Things Entrepreneurs Do To Mess up Their Businesses*

1.  Think Like a Guppy

Okay, so you’re a small company.  Maybe it’s just you and a couple of co-founders. Hell, maybe it really is just you. That’s cause to be judicious with your resources, but it’s no reason to whine.

Somehow in the past few years, it’s become popular to put startups in some sort of protected charitable class.  You’re not a charity, you’re a business and if you want to be a big business, you have to think like one.  Manage your resources, posture, negotiate,  demand performance, deal.

You’re not a little fish; you’re a whale that has a long way to grow. Think like a small business and you’ll stay a small business. Think like a big business and you are more likely to become one.

2. Confuse Vision and Focus

Any business worth doing starts with a big, clear vision, that usually has something to do with owning a market, solving a giant problem, saving the world, or simply total world domination.

Still, there is a giant difference between vision and focus.  Vision is the audacious objective, the big game of entrepreneurship. It is what the business looks like when you’ve achieved your goals.

Focus is how you get there.

Focus is critical because it provides the actionable steps to make a vision a reality.  Focus prevents companies from running off course, or worse, chasing after the shiny objects that pose as opportunity. As importantly, focus provides a measure of progress and keeps ambitious entrepreneurs from becoming overwhelmed by their big vision.

Smart entrepreneurs dream big, but focus tightly. You can eat an elephant, but you have to do it one day at a time.

3.  Confuse activity for focus

There are no idle entrepreneurs.  Indeed, time is the enemy of startups, and every founder is busy, busy, busy building the business.  Or so it seems.

Lots of activity doesn’t necessarily mean lots of progress. If you’re unfocused and doing the wrong things, you can be mighty busy doing little of value.   When you’re lost, don’t just drive faster.  Stop.  Breathe. Assess. Focus.  And maybe even ask for directions.

4. Fall in Love with Technology

Of course you love your technology; every entrepreneur does.  It’s the product, after all, that people will buy. So you give it all your attention, defend it when criticized, convince your self that your baby can’t be ugly.

While dedication to technical excellence is admirable, in  a startup it’s the wrong target for your affection.  Instead, fall in love with your customers. They will tell you what to make.

5.  Focus on Fund Raising Instead of Building a Business

I know.  You need capital to build your company and venture capital is the fastest path to cash in the bank.  Or it used to be.

While few VCs will openly admit that they have much worry, truth is that the venture capital industry is in upheaval.  The perfect storm of the residual dot-com mega-funds, cash-efficient business creation models of the Web 2.0 cycle, and a global economic meltdown leave most funds with capital they can’t invest, capital calls they can’t make, or new funds they can’t raise. VCs are trying to re-engineer (and, in many instances, simply save) their businesses.  And while they may be saying something different, they really aren’t spending as much time thinking about how to invest in yours.

But even in the best of times, the best way to raise capital to build your business is to build and sell products and services that people want to buy.  In fact, nothing catches the interest of VCs like money coming into the company.

Consider that raising venture capital is a time-consuming activity.  Consider how you might otherwise use your time.  Developing a product?  Talking to customers?  Building strong channel partners?  Then consider this: what brings more value to your company: building PowerPoint presentations for Sand Hill Road or building your company?

6. Fail To Measure

Young companies run fast, but not every startup is clear on where they’re going or what it will look like when they arrive.  No doubt there will be plenty of turns along the way, but if you don’t lay down some milestones, you’ll have no way of knowing whether you’re on track or on time.

Companies of all sizes do what they measure, so measure what matters.  Determine by what metrics you will evaluate your progress and by which you will be evaluated by others.  Whether its development deadlines, page views, sign ups, downloads, or whatever – figure out what measurable metrics demonstrate growth and potential for your business.

Include in your metrics the sub-measures that affect the whole.  For example, if the measure is a sales goal, also measure marketing and development activity that contributes to achieving that goal.  That way, you have a clearer view sooner of what is going right, and possibly wrong.

Communicate those metrics to your team so they understand what they are and why they are important.  Then measure and report in meaningful and actionable increments.

7.  Ignore Yellow Lights

Optimism is a critical requirement for entrepreneurs. You have to believe that you can do the impossible while constrained in every possible way.

Still, your optimism can not be allowed to trump your reality.

That’s why metrics and measurement are so important to young companies.   It’s important to set those milestones while everything remains possible and reason rules your business planning.

As you march on, you’ll no doubt miss a milestone or fall short of some measure.  Pay attention. Take time to analyze the shortfall, learn from it and make course corrections as needed.

And, most importantly, listen for that little voice that urges you to press on even when all the warning signs point to another course of action.  Listen for it, not to it.

8. Hire Good People

Smart founders hire great people. Period.

You’ve got more work than you can do alone, your small team can’t move fast enough, and you’ve got the resources to bring in more people.  Hiring fast may seem like the answer.  It rarely is.

As much as founders need people to help build the business, people can be a time sink for founders.  The wrong person in the wrong job will bury you in management hassles, and they can do more to destroy team morale than a weeks of all-nighters.

As counter intuitive as it may seem, it is far better to take time to fill a position with the absolute best hire, than to burn time managing your way out of a bad hire.

9. Neglect the Details

An entrepreneur I know calls the details of budgeting and bookkeeping, employee contracts, stock agreements, and the myriad other details of business life “administrivia.”  It’s a fun word, but there is nothing trivial about business management.

In the earliest days, when you’re working on handshakes and shoestrings, there’s little need for over the top business administration, but that doesn’t obviate the need for some reasonable care.  That care (or lack thereof) will set the tone for your business as it grows.

A little time and a few dollars spent with a bookkeeper and lawyer in your earliest days will save a lot more time and money later when you need clean books and protected IP to make your case to investors, customers, and partners.   Forensic accounting and documentation is very expensive.  You can pay me now, or pay me a lot more later.

10. Lose Site of Your Values

Every company has a culture.  It’s either accidental or deliberate.

An accidental culture grows as people come on to the team, decisions are made, customs established, crises arise, pressures build and release, new challenges and opportunities preset themselves.  How founders act as the business unfolds sets the tone and establishes precedent.  Precedent, re-enacted time and again, grows into corporate culture.

In my experience, most accidental cultures are toxic, not unlike mold growing in a refrigerator; all the best ingredients are there, but having gone ignored or uncared for, they go to waste.

Deliberate cultures aren’t necessarily complex and they don’t require management consultants or self-help books.  They simply require awareness.  What do you believe and value?  If this company is your legacy, how do you want to be known?  How do you want your company to be perceived by its employees, customers, and community?

Let the awareness of and commitment to those values drive your business dealings and decisions. Be consistent with your values, make them part of the company, and demand that those around you do the same.

* with apologies to Dr. Laura Schlessinger for riffing on her popular book titles.


You’re not a little fish; you’re a whale that’s not yet gotten big.

Posted: by chrisshipley on December 15th, 2009 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations, Startups, Uncategorized

I admit I’m a bit behind in my reading amidst end of year planning and all this holiday hoopla, so I’m just getting around to reading Sunday’s Wall Street Journal post asking “Should Start-Up Founders Forget About Business Plans?”

The post quotes HubSpot founder and CEO Brian Halligan saying that creating a business plan is a “fool’s errand,” noting that he has raised some $30million in investment capital without a formal business plan.  He added, “No venture capitalist actually asked us for a business plan.”

There’s long been a debate about the value of a documented business plan in fundraising.  VCs might ask for one, but really (and usually said with a wink and a snicker), we all know they never actually read them. In other words, as Halligan put it, business plans are “a waste of time.”

As business professors everywhere grab their pearls at the thought, let me jump in here and say that Halligan is right – and completely wrong.

A fully-documented, prose-polished, perfect-bound business plan adds little real value to a startup company. But that’s really not the point.

A documented business plan doesn’t simply appear, created from golden cloth as if by some Rumplestilskin-like magic.  Indeed, to say that a business plan is a fool’s errand is missing entirely the nature of the errand itself.  The thinking, measuring, investigating, validating, and actual planning that enables one to write a business plan is what matters.

Halligan goes on to say that startups need only three documents with which to raise money: a PowerPoint presentation, a one-page executive summary, and a “fictitious” pro forma income statement.  All of which, he stresses, are “simple.”

Let’s assume for a moment that Halligan is right.  The subtext of his comments presented at the Puerto Rico Venture Forum, is that the venture guys are kind of superficial and so you, dear entrepreneur, can be, too. Throw together some slides, whip up a couple of paragraphs, invent some numbers. Bob’s your uncle.

I dare you to build a business on that soft foundation. While business plans find their way to the dust bin of history, business planning is critical to the formation and growth of any company.  I’m not talking about lock-yourself-in-a-room-subsist-on-pizza-and-Red-Bull-ignore-incoming-calls-figure-out-every-nuance planning. I’m talking about common sense testing of assumptions, laying out a strategy, idenfitying tactics, and understanding milestones. It shouldn’t take weeks, but it ought to take days.

Without this level of planning, you can’t articulate your business in the infamous 10-slide deck or quick and dirty executive summary.  More importantly, you can’t articulate your business to your team, your potential hires, contractors, and others who will actually help you execute on the business.

It takes time – thoughtful, focused time – to plan a business, but so much less time than tacking from one spaghetti-against-the-wall experiment to the next.

Do I read massive business plans?  No.  Do I expect the companies who seek my help to have planned? Yes!

So while Mr. Halligan may be right that no one reads a business plan, you’ll be dead in the water if you interpret his remarks to mean you needn’t plan at all.

Social Media Campaign managed by Spredfast

Posted: by chrisshipley on October 30th, 2009 | No Comments »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations

A couple weeks ago, I had the pleasure to speak at Startup Camp in Montreal.  During the Q&A to an audience of mostly first-time entrepreneurs, I described entrepreneurship thusly:

Imagine you’re at Disneyland. It’s August. The California sun is hot.  You’re in line for the Space Mountain ride and you just know it’s going to be great.  You’re eating ice cream, which seems nice, but the sun is melting the ice cream faster than you can eat it and sticky, milky stuff is running down your arm and making you pretty uncomfortable.

The line moves and you go from too bright sunlight into the dark entrance of the ride.  You’re not exactly sure where you’re going, but it’s getting exciting.   You stumble along until you get used to the dark.

Then, it’s your turn. You scramble into the roller coaster and just as you expected, it’s thrilling. The anticipation of the climb, the rapid drop, another climb.   In a matter of minutes, the ride comes to an end.

You get out of the car and throw up.

The next day, you do it all over again.

That is what it feels like to be an entrepreneur.

Posted: by chrisshipley on October 22nd, 2009 | No Comments »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations, Startups, Venture Capital

I had a delightful lunch yesterday with Howard Hartenbaum, a general partner at August Capital.  The lunch was offered as a “prize”  during Lunchster‘s  six-minute product launch at DEMOfall. I’d agreed to have lunch with whomever won the draw, even these are the sort of promises that can pretty rapidly go bad.  You have no idea who you’ll end up sitting across from, wishing that you’d suggested Taco Bell drive through as a speedy alternative to the white-linen dinning you had to endure.

When I got the email that Howard would be my lunch date, I felt like I was the winner.  I’d first met Howard as part of the team that launched Public Minds’ response aggregation system at DEMO 2001.  Since that time, he’d made the move from entrepreneur to VC and scored his “big win” – an early investment in Skype. His choice of Palo Alto’s Tamerine Restaurant only confirmed that Howard still picks winners; it’s a local favorite of mine).

Most charmingly, Howard didn’t seem to want to monopolize the conversation with shop talk.   Instead, shared restaurant tips, swapped medical mystery stories, railed on litigation-happy parasites, and concocted an elaborate story of long-suppressed love unleashed by a chance encounter courtesy of Lunchster.

Since I was pretty sure no one would believe that last yarn, I asked Howard what he didn’t like about being a VC.  “I don’t like saying no,” he responded without hesitation, adding that it’s made worse by the fact that as a VC one must “say ‘no’ 99% of the time.”

Okay, I’m a bit cynical when it comes to what venture guys say and what they do, and in my experience, most VCs don’t say no.  They say things like “I need you get more customer traction” or “this deal is too early for us but come back in six months” or “I’ll need to get my partners on board with this” or a couple dozen variations on these themes.

Howard seemed to sense what I was thinking. “Venture capitalists have two responses to entrepreneurs,” he said, “yes and everything else.”

To his great credit, Howard decided to take on “no” head on.  “In life and in work, when there is something that makes me really uncomfortable, I make a point of doing it in the hopes that I’ll become inured to it.”

So when he decides to take a pass on a company, he calls the entrepreneur directly and tells him no.  Has it gotten any easier?  “No.”

But he does it.  He does it because he respects entrepreneurs. He does it because he isn’t going to waste their time.  He does it so that entrepreneurs know the why behind the no.

A “no” is such a rarity in the venture hunt that entrepreneurs may not know how to act.  Here’s my advice:  don’t argue, don’t debate, don’t tell a guy like Howard that he’s wrong.

Listen for the no and be glad for it.  That VC is saving you time and heart ache.  Listen to it, accept it, and move on.

Posted: by chrisshipley on October 12th, 2009 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Investing, Observations, Venture Capital

Jason Calacanis is at it again, and this time – dare I say it – the man has a point.  In a post last Friday, Jason rails (does he do anything other?) against angel investor groups that charge startups a fee to present at their forums.

He writes:

Recently, I was made aware of a group of angel investors that were charging startups to pitch them.

Yes, you heard that correctly: the rich people (angels) are charging the poor people (startup entrepreneurs desperate for cash to fuel their dreams) to hear their pitch. No, I’m not kidding. This is actually happening — and it’s widespread.

While I’ve long found insulting Jason’s “payola” rants and the accompanying characterizations of first-time founders as poor, lost and naïve inventors unable to make reasoned and reasonable decisions about how best to apply their scant resources, this time he’s got a point: savvy investors should bear the cost of meeting entrepreneurs and reviewing deal flow as the price of entry to the venture asset class.   But rather than decry the practice and advise young entrepreneurs, Jason does what he always does:

When I heard this, my blood started to boil immediately. So, I did what any maniacal, self-absorbed CEO from Brooklyn would do: I started a jihad against this dispicable [sic] form of payola and the people doing it. It’s on people … it’s on like a Donkey Kong.

. . . [If investor groups do not disclose their practices or stop charging fees],  my group of startup CEOs and angel investors will begin targeting specific groups for elimination. We will launch competing, fee-free events directly opposite your events. We will encourage angels [sic] investors, service providers and startups to boycott your events. You may even find our street teams outside your events handing out flyers.

So, while Jason arms his (cough) “Nation” with fliers and vindictive, how about some clear advice for entrepreneurs?

You see, unlike Jason, I don’t believe that entrepreneurs who pay to participate in investor pitch events are “ugly, unpopular and lack talent.”  Come on. Even Hugh Grant paid for sex.

Let’s face it: For the vast majority of startups, fund raising is a full-time occupation. Silicon Valley is a tight-knit and sometimes insular environment. It’s an environment of networks where who you know and how you know them is the difference between a call back and deafening silence.  And, frankly, an environment in which one should never confuse luck for talent.  Great entrepreneurs learn to navigate into that network, establishing relationships, seeking advice, giving as good as getting in order to be seen and heard above the throngs of entrepreneurs who also have dreams that just need a dose of capital to be realized.  For entrepreneurs relocating their businesses to the Valley from overseas or even across the Continent, the networking is even that much harder.

So, it’s tempting to want to shortcut that process, and nothing says “shortcut” like cash. Why not spend 1,000 bucks if a kiretsu of wealthy angels will listen to your pitch? And make no doubt about it, every entrepreneur who has ever pitched at a PlugAndPlay Expo has been told by at least one “investment consultant” that he’ll have to hire his way to venture capital.   A fifteen grand retainer and five to 10 points are table stakes.

For some entrepreneurs, the gamble pays off.  It’s an expensive way to raise money; before you’re even started as much as 10 percent of the raised capital is gone.  But, again, let’s be real:  the vast majority of startups don’t raise money from name-brand angels or top tier institutional investors.  In fact, the vast majority of startups aren’t successful in raising outside money at all.  These pay-to-pitch venues exist as a resource of last resort for entrepreneurs who haven’t had the good counsel to consider other options.

Railing against investor groups is one way to fight pay-to-pitch sessions, but I doubt it will work.  So long as there are entrepreneurs who relentlessly pursue their dreams, someone will find some way to exploit them.  But again, it needs to be said: no one is forcing those entrepreneurs to pony up for a pitch.  They make that (perhaps bad) choice all on their own.

Picketing investor meetings may make a statement, but if Jason – or any of us – really wants to support entrepreneurs, we’d do well to open our minds and our networks to them, remembering to give as good as we got when we first came to the Valley.

Posted: by chrisshipley on February 19th, 2009 | 10 Comments »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, DEMO Conference, Entrepreneurship, Guidewire Group, Startups

Who could ask for a better job? For the past 13 years, I’ve spent my days talking with some of the smartest people on the planet. People passionate about technology and the art and science of molding that technology into products and services that address real challenges and bring new capabilities to people’s lives.

I’d be hard pressed to make an accurate count, but I’d guess that since taking the reins of DEMO in the spring of 1996, I’ve met no fewer than 15,000 entrepreneurs, inventors, and innovators, and helped about 1,500 of them launch their products to market on the DEMO stage.

DEMO has given me the opportunity to travel the world; meet with government officials and business leaders; interview certified geniuses and a few certifiable nut cases, and through newsletters (back in the day), blog posts, speaking gigs, interviews, and the DEMO conference itself share back a bit of what I’ve learned and the realizations that learning sparked.

DEMO, with its emphasis on product innovation, is an amazing lens and filter through which to gauge the future of the information technology industry and the markets as they open, undulate, and fold over time. The conference is a tremendous reviewing platform for new ideas and a lookout post for emerging and impactful trends.

It may not be surprising, then, to learn that after all these years, the lookout perch that is DEMO gave me the opportunity to see a new future for myself and for my company, Guidewire Group.

So early last year, I began the process of transitioning from DEMO so that I could start my next career in earnest. The first step, of course, was making sure that this was the right new path for myself, my family, and my Guidewire Group colleagues. DEMO has been a big part of all our lives for a long, long time. We all did a lot of soul searching and determined that, yes, we were ready to put our full energies behind the Guidewire Group business: working with technology companies during the critical transition points in their businesses to identify opportunity, define strategy, and accelerate the path to success.

The next step was more difficult: working with our partners at IDG and Network World to identify a successor. DEMO is a great job and a challenging one, and it’s not an easy post to fill. We found the most perfect fit in an accomplished journalist, entrepreneur, and kindred spirit, Matt Marshall. Over the last year, I’ve had the opportunity to work with and get to know Matt and his team at Venture Beat. He is a talented, smart, deeply ethical journalist and he and his writers have created a remarkable, respected brand and business. And he is the perfect person to pick up the reins of DEMO as I lay them down after the DEMOfall event in September.

Matt and I share many of the same values, foremost of which are the respect for entrepreneurs and the process of innovation and the commitment to act with integrity and fairness as we serve our customers and communities. But Matt and Venture Beat are more than a pin-for-pin replacement for me and Guidewire Group. They bring new perspective to DEMO. While much about DEMO will remain the same, surely Matt will make a wonderful impression on the brand and the business. The new partnership between DEMO and Venture Beat promises a broader platform for the DEMO community and a richer conversation that will span the events. Together, Venture Beat and DEMO have an exciting future, and I’m eager to see it unfold.

I’m equally eager to unfold the future of Guidewire Group, a company I co-founded in 200 with Mike Sigal. In the past four years, Guidewire Group has evolved into an analyst firm laser-focused on startups. We work with young companies in the U.S. and Europe at key transition points, to develop and deliver business strategy and monetization and market validation. Through custom projects, events such as Innovate!Europe, and Guidewire Studio, our exclusive in-residence program, we’re doing the work I love most – helping startups thrive.

We have an exciting future planned for Guidewire Group and I look forward to sharing our vision with you in the months ahead. We have been privileged and honored to work with this great brand and the amazing people who have been associated with DEMO across the last 13 years.

And we’re looking forward to the next six months as we work just as diligently as we always have on DEMOfall 09, while transitioning the Executive Producer mantle to Matt and his team.

Posted: by carlacthompson on January 26th, 2009 | No Comments »

Categorized: Carla Thompson, Entrepreneurship, Europe, Innovate!Europe

Several weeks ago, we published a list of the participating startups in our Going Global workshop for Innovate!Europe. The kickoff workshop in Zaragoza had 24 enthusiastic startups, all hungry for knowledge and tips on succeeding in Silicon Valley and beyond. With such great ideas and innovative entrepreneurs, it was difficult to narrow down the field. But we’ve chosen nine companies as finalists who will now advance to the Master Class, to be held in Zaragoza May 4-6. We’re headed to London and Dublin next week for our next round of workshops so look for more Innovate!Europe news in the coming weeks. And if you’re a startup near London or Dublin, there’s still time to apply!

Congratulations to:

Unkasoft Advergaming – mobile advertising inside any type of mobile app

Alphasip – nanotech diagnostic medical systems

Ideas4All – global community of ideas to build the global brain

SevenClick – mobile push communication platform, allowing encryption in multi-device environments

Trourist – travel social network to create and collaborate on trips

eBox Technologies – administration of corporate networks, specifically focused on SMBs

Mapalia – local social network for, ultimately, every city in the world

Cierzo – helping brands track customer feedback across the Web

Safe Creative – free online copyright registration for the digital era