Archive for the ‘Chris Shipley’ Category

All posts in Chris Shipley category.

Posted: by chrisshipley on March 25th, 2010 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations, Startups

Now that health insurance reform is out of the way (sort of), our employees in Washington (that is, Congressional reps and Senators) will surely turn their attention (if not their bipartisan cooperation) to economic stimulus and finance industry reform (get ready for Obstructionist Politics: Round 2).

Among the bits of joy in the financial reform bill proposed by the Senate Banking Committee are new guidelines for individual investors and the startups they support, guidelines that significantly and negatively impact the seed funding ecosystem.

The proposed legislation doubles the measure of net worth or income  required for an individual angel investor to be accredited, and nascent companies would be required to climb a mountain of paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission then wait up to 120 days for the SEC to review it.

These proposed rule changes throw sand into the gears of entrepreneurship and for what purpose?  If capital is not already difficult to come by for startups, this financial reform would effectively evaporate the pool of angel investment.  And while the SEC plods its way through filing reviews, time will be killing young businesses.

There are enough laws, regulations, and daily shenanigans to demonstrate that Congress hasn’t a clue about entrepreneurship.

So let’s be clear: entrepreneurship is, and always has been, the driver of the  economy.  Risk-taking individuals start new businesses, hire employees, create opportunities and build wealth that is often re-invested in local communities. Rather than imposing new regulation that makes these companies stillborn, Congress should be removing obstacles to capital.

Instead, Congress focuses on mega-banks and Fortune 500 companies, unwilling to let these leviathans of business falter.  They need to shift their attention and their policy initiatives to the Fortune 500,000 companies that are too small to be allowed to fail.  These companies employ more than 100 million people in the U.S. and earn upwards of $22T in revenue each year. Numbers, by the way, that stack up very favorably against the Fortune 500′s worldwide performance data of 24M employees and $9T in revenue).

We rarely use the Guidewire Group pulpit to incite political action, but if you’ve ever cared about an entrepreneur or imagine you might one day start a company of your own, now is the time to reach out to your elected officials and demand these onerous “reforms” be removed from the forthcoming legislation.

Posted: by chrisshipley on March 11th, 2010 | No Comments »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, G/Score, Innovate!Europe

Last week, Guidewire Group  kicked off the Innovate 2010 program with Pitch Slam events in Zaragoza and Madrid.  In all, 22 companies presented their businesses in our fast-paced, 5-minute format designed to quickly tease out a company’s market opportunity, unique differentiation, and execution against plans.  As company’s pitch the business, our esteemed judges evaluate the startups using our G/Score methodology.

To refresh your memory, the G/Score is an assessment of a company’s business opportunity and market traction at a point in time. The seven-factor score looks at overall concept, market opportunity and challenges, product and business execution, team and business model.  The G/Score is not intended to be a predictor of success or to be a substitute for diligence.  It is a gauge of potential and performance.

Since introducing the G/Score (first privately to hundreds of executives and entrepreneurs and then publicly earlier this year), we’ve been asked a lot of questions, as you would expect, about the efficacy of the G/Score.  Is it “accurate”?  Does it successfully predict winners?  And perhaps the most incredulous one: How can you judge a company in just 5 minutes?!

In a world as fraught with execution risk, hard work and luck, it’s difficult to know what “accurate” might mean in the context of a startup business.  The G/Score isn’t a measure like weight or height that can be compared to an absolute scale.  Startups have no absolute scale.  But the G/Score does accurately assesses where a company is today.  At what stage is product development?  How complete is the team?

Does this accurate assessment predict success? I’d argue that the G/Score is an assessment of potential.  Continued execution on the business, smart reaction to the market, and a commitment to product excellent drive success.

Most importantly, it turns out, The G/Score provides a common language and a foundation for constructive conversations between entrepreneurs and the marketplace.  And that’s what makes the G/Score a valuable tool in assessing companies in 5-minute Pitch Slams or in hour-long one-on-one meetings.

Every day, startups submit their businesses to quick judgment from investors, customers, potential partners.  They do it at events like the Innovate!2010 Pitch Slams, at conferences, competitions, and meetups.  Often, the judging criteria is little more than a gut feeling and a wet finger int he air.

What we’ve found in just a very short time is that the G/Score gives a judging panel – and ultimately with the people who are in a position to invest, partner, and otherwise support these young companies – a standardized way of thinking about a company that supplements instincts and directs the conversation to a productive and constructive dialog about the business.

Over the course of two Pitch Slam events in Spain, the quality of comments and questions put forward by the judges and audience was substantive to the company’s position and traction in the market.  Gone were the pot shots and gut feelings that are so often center stage when “experts” sit in public judgment of startups, and along with it the defensiveness that entrepreneurs often project when they’re under the spotlight of such random scrutiny.

In short, the G/Score worked to change the tenor of the dialog and every startup, whether top scoring or newly rising, could take away valuable feedback and constructive advice from the judging panel.

As you might expect, not every company has perfect pitch.  So another key learning from the evening is that entrepreneurs must continually fine-tune their company presentations, and if they tune to the G/Score, we believe they will be communicating more effectively the potential and execution excellence of their companies.

Guidewire Group strives to make the G/Score methodology and criteria transparent so that entrepreneurs understand clearly how they are being assessed.  We provide training videos that describe the score and provide advice on how to present a company for the purpose of being scored. Use these materials to hone your own business presentation, whether you’re pitching for a G/Score or selling your first products.

By tuning into the G/Score, you are stating clearly and as objectively (at least as objectively as a thing as tenuous as a startup can be) what your business is all about, how you will win the market, your commitment to technology and business execution, and the team that will drive your success.

Posted: by chrisshipley on February 26th, 2010 | No Comments »

Categorized: Business Models, Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations

Several days later and I’m still reacting to the amazing day that was TEDxAustin.  In a day jammed with wonderful ideas, insightful speakers, engaged audience, and some stunning performances, I had the privilege of sharing one of my ideas within the event’s banner “Play Big.”

Being the contrarian I am, of course, my talk centered on the idea of remaining small.  Here’s my case:

Consider the sumo wrestler.  He’s one big boy.  Professional sumo wrestlers – of which there are 700 in Japan’s traditional training centers, or heyas - weigh in from 250 to 500 pounds.  They are very competitive in a decidedly individual competition, and while they are strong and quick in short bursts, they can be cumbersome and slow outside the ring.  Maybe most importantly, they are bound by centuries of tradition.

Now, consider the peloton.  A compact team of athletes, the peloton leverages the strength of individual members to deliver benefit to the whole.  By working together, an well-architected peloton can reduce wind drag by as much as 40% to operate with greater efficiency and greater speed.  Throughout a race, the peloton can react to changing conditions and proactively seize new opportunity.  In a word, pelotons are entreprenurial.

In the world of business, the sumo is a big company, which is resource rich, with strong brand power and great global reach.  With a rich legacy in the market, big companies – like tradition-bound sumo wrestlers – are well rooted, and while that provides great stability, it can also make change difficult for the big company.

The peloton, as you might have now guessed, is a small business.   They may well be resource constrained, but they tend to be on a first-name basis with their customers.  Small businesses have a strong connection to their local community, and yet they often play in global markets. With fewer and thinner layers of decision making, small businesses are adaptive.  They can be risk takers.  And often because of their constrained resource and their close ties with customers, small businesses must be incredibly innovative to serve their markets.

As entrepreneurs, we aspire to be big businesses.  That, after all, is what investors look for and what the public markets reward.  The Fortune 500, we often assume, are the drivers of the global economy.  In 2006, the Fortune 500 had aggregated revenues of more than $9 trillion, with profits of $610B.  With nearly 25 million employees world wide, the Fortune 500 earns $368,000 per worker.  In big energy, that number can reach as high as $1m per worker and in the retail sector it drops to about $200,000 per employee. If the Fortune 500 were a country, it would be the second largest economy in the world.

Impressive.  But let’s consider the other 29,599,500 businesses in America, business employing fewer than 500 people.  Most of these are sole proprietorship; only some 5.7M businesses have employees, but among them they employ nearly 115M workers and generate $22 trillion (yep, that’s more than 2x the Fortune 500 in the U.S. alone.) .  If you’re doing the math, that’s about $192,000 per employee.

We tend to think of big business at the head of the long tail of business.  I’d argue we turn that graph on its side.  The size of the ecosystem swirling around small business and the economic value created by it outstrips the Fortune 500.   In the U.S. alone, small business accounts for nearly half of the GDP.  Worldwide, small businesses in aggregate must certainly stand and the largest global economic force.

The entrepreneurs who start small businesses are arguably the most innovative.  Think of the market-changing, market-making innovations of the last 10 years.  Software as a Service, smart phones, eCommerce platforms and businesses, fundamental Web technologies and security systems, digital media and the DVR.  These, among many others, were developed not in big companies (in fact, many big companies failed to deliver products in these categories), but by small entrepreneurial businesses.

The irony is that the very thing that makes a big business “successful” is that thing that often prevents them from furthering their success.  Big businesses lumber under the weight of  their size, unable to move fast enough on their own.  That’s the good news for startups who become targets of acquisition, as big business consumer young companies like so many calories in order to fuel their innovation engine.

But what if there were a different model?  What if we rewarded companies not for getting big, but for being efficient engines of innovation, employment, and value creation?  Imagine for a moment the rise of the Fortune 500,000, those top small businesses that outperform the markets by performing well together, much like a peloton.

Individually, each small corporation is strong, highly adaptable, capital efficient, and profitable.  These strong businesses remain agile, able to pounce on new opportunities and deliver results without wading through layers of decision making and corporate process.

Best of all, they can easily partner with other strong small enterprises to tackle a market or create one.  Each small enterprise brings its unique and highly-tuned capability to the partnership.  At the risk of mixing my metaphors,  each small enterprise is a free atom that can bond with other organizations in a precise formula to attack a business opportunity.  They can decouple and re-attach to other organizations when new opportunities arise.

Collectively, they can be stronger and more competitive against lumbering large organizations than they ever could be on their own.  And, collectively, they can react more quickly and be more responsive to a changing market environment than large companies can.

With specialization to deliver expertise and collaboration to deliver complete market value, the peloton model of business will drive innovation and create economic value.

Whether today’s capital markets can be as reactive to this coming business change is an entirely different matter.

Posted: by chrisshipley on January 19th, 2010 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, G/Score

Last November, Guidewire Group had the opportunity to spend three amazing days with eight outstanding entrepreneurs of the 2009 PIPELINE program, as we delivered an intensive workshop of business communication.  Ours was the last of four modules in the year-long business acceleration program to provide high-potential young companies with business skills training, mentorship, and peer review and support.

During our time with the PIPELINE teams, we got to learn a lot about the program from PIPELINE CEO Joni Cobb.   Our window into the program was brief but clear: the program combines working on the business with working in the business.  The entrepreneurs are given the guidance to lead their companies more effectively and prodded the hit critical milestones precisely.  Among the many non-profit and government-funded startup accelerators we’ve studied, PIPELINE is a model to emulate.

Far away from the buzz and energy of any recognized tech center, the companies of the PIPELINE program have achieved a measure of experience and success that would set them apart and above the crowded startup landscapes around the U.S.

And did I mention, PIPELINE is in Kansas.  Not exactly the hotbed of innovation, some would say. Yet these eight companies are, simply put, inspiring.  For the most part, they’ve built their businesses with a scrappy mixture of hard work, optimism, and an exacting focus on their customers’ needs.  Few of the eight have taken professional venture capital, yet all of them present smart investment opportunity.

On Thursday night, one of them will be crowned Innovator of the Year. By any measure, it’s going to be a tough competition.  Guidewire Group wishes each of these companies best of luck at the award ceremony on Thursday, and we wish them every success in the future. (UPDATE: Farms Tech CEO Jason Tatge was named Innovator of the Year at the PIPELINE gala celebration on January 21. – ed.)

As part of our workshop, we provided a G/Score assessment for each company.  Here are the eight companies:
Emerge Medical Solutions, LLC
Lenexa, Kansas
Jerry Calovich, C0-founder

The company  has created a new and clinically proven approach to improve the quality of healthcare delivered to patients with cardiovascular disease.  Emerge Medical Solutions G/Score

EcoFit Lighting
Lenexa, Kansas
Cason Coplin, President

EcoFit Lighting designs, manufactures and markets high-output, energy-efficient LED streetlights that can be retro fit with existing utility lighting fixtures.  EcoFit Lighting G/Score.

iSi Recycling Services
Wichita, Kansas
Gary Mason, Founder & CEO

A spin out of iSi Environmental Services, this company has developed a process for creating active carbon from carbon fiber manufacturing waste.  iSi Recycling Services G/Score

Robotzone, LLC
Winfield, Kansas
Brian Pettey, Founder & CEO

Robotzone designs and develops robots and robotic components for commercial, industrial and military applications, and has developed a new robotic camera platform for the film and video industry. Robotzone G/Score

AthletixNation, Inc.
Lenexa, Kansas
Davyeon Ross,  Founder & CEO

The company  has acquired a multi-year license to publish and distribute Division I college sports video content to media properties and sports Internet sites via its multimedia content and advertising platform.  AthletixNation G/Score

BRKZ Corp.
Overland Park, KS
Chris Routh President & CEO
BRKZ creates game changing internet properties, such as   Hurox.com, a groundbreaking online social marketplace allowing talented individuals to market and sell their digitally created online content to the masses, and FreshlyBranded.com, a marketing services marketplace. FreshlyBranded.com G/Score

Orbis BioSciences
Kansas City, Kansas
Maria Stecklein, VP Business Development

Orbis Biosciences offers clients a new way to create microparticles that gives unprecedented control of release rate with any material. Orbis BioSciences G/Score

Farms Technology, LLC
Lenexa, Kansas
Jason Tatge, CEO

Based on its Dynamic Pricing Platform and Pioneer MarketPoint, the company makes commodity trading more efficient by offering automated marketing tools to farmers and grain buyers. Farms Technology G/Score

Posted: by carlacthompson on January 4th, 2010 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Guidewire Group

For nearly two decades, I and my colleagues at Guidewire Group have been evaluating startup companies.  Combined, we estimate that we’ve looked at more than 20,000 startups over the years, trying to pinpoint what bodes well, and what portends a darker future for entrepreneurs creating companies and bringing new innovations to market.

Those many meetings have lead us to a surprisingly narrow set of criteria – seven actually – that prove to be strong indicators of a startup’s prospects and potential.    Over the last year, we’ve codified those criteria into what we now call the G/Score.   The G/Score is a transparent, quantitative assessment methodology designed not just to rate early-stage companies, but also to provide a diagnostic of a company’s strengths and challenges.  The G/Score is prescriptive, providing clear measurement and obvious benchmarks that a young company can aspire to achieve, and in so doing improve the likelihood of its success.

As we embark on the new year, Guidewire Group is launching what may well prove to be our biggest endeavor to date:  encode 20 years and 20,000 interviews into a rich assessment tool that will enable entrepreneurs to evaluate their business concepts, receive directed feedback about their ideas, and get advice to support their business execution. (We’ll be posting our first G/Score scorecard of a company later this week.)

We tested the G/Score concept and methodology throughout 2009 – on entrepreneurs, on large companies that work with startups, on economic and government development agencies charged with catalyzing entrepreneurship. During this process, we found one champion that we’d not quite expected: The National Science Foundation.  The Foundation is charged, through its SBIR program, with supporting tech transfer through entrepreneurship.   Thousands of researchers and entrepreneurs apply for SBIR grants each year and the NSF does an incredible job of providing real support, along with grant money, to validate and commercialize research innovations.

Their challenge, not surprisingly, is scaling their programs in order to provide real guidance and mentorship to the entrepreneurs who receive SBIR grants.

When our champion at  NSF learned about the G/Score, he encouraged us to apply for a grant ourselves, suggesting that we develop an online self-evaluation tool for entrepreneurs that would provide assessment and prescriptive direction for business improvement and acceleration.

Late in 2009, we learned that we’d received the grant to develop proof-of-concept for this self-assessment tool.   As you can imagine, we are thrilled to have the support of the NSF to further the cause of startups and technology innovation in the U.S.

It’s an exciting project, and we’re putting together a crack team of project managers and developers to turn that rich experience into an even richer prototype of the G/Score online.  As we cast our nets to put together the best team and to build the right product, we hope that we can, as always, engage the wonderful community that is the Guidewire Group network, to come along on this exciting ride.

Posted: by chrisshipley on December 20th, 2009 | 8 Comments »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations, Startups

In October, I spoke at Startup Camp Montreal5 about the 10 Stupid Things Entrepreneurs Do to Mess Up Their Businesses, and alluded to that talk again recently at the Forum for Entrepreneurs and Executives conference on entrepreneurship.  It came up in conversation again on Friday so it seems high time I actually post the notes from the talk on our blog.

I hope by pointing out common blunders, I can help entrepreneurs avoid a few of the dumb mistakes that (almost) every startup makes.  I also hope that some of you who have tripped into these potholes of entrepreneurship might come forward as case studies for a collection of essays that I’m compiling.  If you have a story that serves as object lesson to fellow entrepreneurs, I’d love to talk to you about it.  I promise to protect identities (where necessary and/or requested) and to be gentle with you.  The goal of the book is to help new entrepreneurs learn from those who have gone before.   If you’re interested in sharing a story, contact me via email.

Now, on to the list of 10 Stupid Things Entrepreneurs Do To Mess up Their Businesses*

1.  Think Like a Guppy

Okay, so you’re a small company.  Maybe it’s just you and a couple of co-founders. Hell, maybe it really is just you. That’s cause to be judicious with your resources, but it’s no reason to whine.

Somehow in the past few years, it’s become popular to put startups in some sort of protected charitable class.  You’re not a charity, you’re a business and if you want to be a big business, you have to think like one.  Manage your resources, posture, negotiate,  demand performance, deal.

You’re not a little fish; you’re a whale that has a long way to grow. Think like a small business and you’ll stay a small business. Think like a big business and you are more likely to become one.

2. Confuse Vision and Focus

Any business worth doing starts with a big, clear vision, that usually has something to do with owning a market, solving a giant problem, saving the world, or simply total world domination.

Still, there is a giant difference between vision and focus.  Vision is the audacious objective, the big game of entrepreneurship. It is what the business looks like when you’ve achieved your goals.

Focus is how you get there.

Focus is critical because it provides the actionable steps to make a vision a reality.  Focus prevents companies from running off course, or worse, chasing after the shiny objects that pose as opportunity. As importantly, focus provides a measure of progress and keeps ambitious entrepreneurs from becoming overwhelmed by their big vision.

Smart entrepreneurs dream big, but focus tightly. You can eat an elephant, but you have to do it one day at a time.

3.  Confuse activity for focus

There are no idle entrepreneurs.  Indeed, time is the enemy of startups, and every founder is busy, busy, busy building the business.  Or so it seems.

Lots of activity doesn’t necessarily mean lots of progress. If you’re unfocused and doing the wrong things, you can be mighty busy doing little of value.   When you’re lost, don’t just drive faster.  Stop.  Breathe. Assess. Focus.  And maybe even ask for directions.

4. Fall in Love with Technology

Of course you love your technology; every entrepreneur does.  It’s the product, after all, that people will buy. So you give it all your attention, defend it when criticized, convince your self that your baby can’t be ugly.

While dedication to technical excellence is admirable, in  a startup it’s the wrong target for your affection.  Instead, fall in love with your customers. They will tell you what to make.

5.  Focus on Fund Raising Instead of Building a Business

I know.  You need capital to build your company and venture capital is the fastest path to cash in the bank.  Or it used to be.

While few VCs will openly admit that they have much worry, truth is that the venture capital industry is in upheaval.  The perfect storm of the residual dot-com mega-funds, cash-efficient business creation models of the Web 2.0 cycle, and a global economic meltdown leave most funds with capital they can’t invest, capital calls they can’t make, or new funds they can’t raise. VCs are trying to re-engineer (and, in many instances, simply save) their businesses.  And while they may be saying something different, they really aren’t spending as much time thinking about how to invest in yours.

But even in the best of times, the best way to raise capital to build your business is to build and sell products and services that people want to buy.  In fact, nothing catches the interest of VCs like money coming into the company.

Consider that raising venture capital is a time-consuming activity.  Consider how you might otherwise use your time.  Developing a product?  Talking to customers?  Building strong channel partners?  Then consider this: what brings more value to your company: building PowerPoint presentations for Sand Hill Road or building your company?

6. Fail To Measure

Young companies run fast, but not every startup is clear on where they’re going or what it will look like when they arrive.  No doubt there will be plenty of turns along the way, but if you don’t lay down some milestones, you’ll have no way of knowing whether you’re on track or on time.

Companies of all sizes do what they measure, so measure what matters.  Determine by what metrics you will evaluate your progress and by which you will be evaluated by others.  Whether its development deadlines, page views, sign ups, downloads, or whatever – figure out what measurable metrics demonstrate growth and potential for your business.

Include in your metrics the sub-measures that affect the whole.  For example, if the measure is a sales goal, also measure marketing and development activity that contributes to achieving that goal.  That way, you have a clearer view sooner of what is going right, and possibly wrong.

Communicate those metrics to your team so they understand what they are and why they are important.  Then measure and report in meaningful and actionable increments.

7.  Ignore Yellow Lights

Optimism is a critical requirement for entrepreneurs. You have to believe that you can do the impossible while constrained in every possible way.

Still, your optimism can not be allowed to trump your reality.

That’s why metrics and measurement are so important to young companies.   It’s important to set those milestones while everything remains possible and reason rules your business planning.

As you march on, you’ll no doubt miss a milestone or fall short of some measure.  Pay attention. Take time to analyze the shortfall, learn from it and make course corrections as needed.

And, most importantly, listen for that little voice that urges you to press on even when all the warning signs point to another course of action.  Listen for it, not to it.

8. Hire Good People

Smart founders hire great people. Period.

You’ve got more work than you can do alone, your small team can’t move fast enough, and you’ve got the resources to bring in more people.  Hiring fast may seem like the answer.  It rarely is.

As much as founders need people to help build the business, people can be a time sink for founders.  The wrong person in the wrong job will bury you in management hassles, and they can do more to destroy team morale than a weeks of all-nighters.

As counter intuitive as it may seem, it is far better to take time to fill a position with the absolute best hire, than to burn time managing your way out of a bad hire.

9. Neglect the Details

An entrepreneur I know calls the details of budgeting and bookkeeping, employee contracts, stock agreements, and the myriad other details of business life “administrivia.”  It’s a fun word, but there is nothing trivial about business management.

In the earliest days, when you’re working on handshakes and shoestrings, there’s little need for over the top business administration, but that doesn’t obviate the need for some reasonable care.  That care (or lack thereof) will set the tone for your business as it grows.

A little time and a few dollars spent with a bookkeeper and lawyer in your earliest days will save a lot more time and money later when you need clean books and protected IP to make your case to investors, customers, and partners.   Forensic accounting and documentation is very expensive.  You can pay me now, or pay me a lot more later.

10. Lose Site of Your Values

Every company has a culture.  It’s either accidental or deliberate.

An accidental culture grows as people come on to the team, decisions are made, customs established, crises arise, pressures build and release, new challenges and opportunities preset themselves.  How founders act as the business unfolds sets the tone and establishes precedent.  Precedent, re-enacted time and again, grows into corporate culture.

In my experience, most accidental cultures are toxic, not unlike mold growing in a refrigerator; all the best ingredients are there, but having gone ignored or uncared for, they go to waste.

Deliberate cultures aren’t necessarily complex and they don’t require management consultants or self-help books.  They simply require awareness.  What do you believe and value?  If this company is your legacy, how do you want to be known?  How do you want your company to be perceived by its employees, customers, and community?

Let the awareness of and commitment to those values drive your business dealings and decisions. Be consistent with your values, make them part of the company, and demand that those around you do the same.

* with apologies to Dr. Laura Schlessinger for riffing on her popular book titles.


You’re not a little fish; you’re a whale that’s not yet gotten big.

Posted: by chrisshipley on December 15th, 2009 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Entrepreneurship, Observations, Startups, Uncategorized

I admit I’m a bit behind in my reading amidst end of year planning and all this holiday hoopla, so I’m just getting around to reading Sunday’s Wall Street Journal post asking “Should Start-Up Founders Forget About Business Plans?”

The post quotes HubSpot founder and CEO Brian Halligan saying that creating a business plan is a “fool’s errand,” noting that he has raised some $30million in investment capital without a formal business plan.  He added, “No venture capitalist actually asked us for a business plan.”

There’s long been a debate about the value of a documented business plan in fundraising.  VCs might ask for one, but really (and usually said with a wink and a snicker), we all know they never actually read them. In other words, as Halligan put it, business plans are “a waste of time.”

As business professors everywhere grab their pearls at the thought, let me jump in here and say that Halligan is right – and completely wrong.

A fully-documented, prose-polished, perfect-bound business plan adds little real value to a startup company. But that’s really not the point.

A documented business plan doesn’t simply appear, created from golden cloth as if by some Rumplestilskin-like magic.  Indeed, to say that a business plan is a fool’s errand is missing entirely the nature of the errand itself.  The thinking, measuring, investigating, validating, and actual planning that enables one to write a business plan is what matters.

Halligan goes on to say that startups need only three documents with which to raise money: a PowerPoint presentation, a one-page executive summary, and a “fictitious” pro forma income statement.  All of which, he stresses, are “simple.”

Let’s assume for a moment that Halligan is right.  The subtext of his comments presented at the Puerto Rico Venture Forum, is that the venture guys are kind of superficial and so you, dear entrepreneur, can be, too. Throw together some slides, whip up a couple of paragraphs, invent some numbers. Bob’s your uncle.

I dare you to build a business on that soft foundation. While business plans find their way to the dust bin of history, business planning is critical to the formation and growth of any company.  I’m not talking about lock-yourself-in-a-room-subsist-on-pizza-and-Red-Bull-ignore-incoming-calls-figure-out-every-nuance planning. I’m talking about common sense testing of assumptions, laying out a strategy, idenfitying tactics, and understanding milestones. It shouldn’t take weeks, but it ought to take days.

Without this level of planning, you can’t articulate your business in the infamous 10-slide deck or quick and dirty executive summary.  More importantly, you can’t articulate your business to your team, your potential hires, contractors, and others who will actually help you execute on the business.

It takes time – thoughtful, focused time – to plan a business, but so much less time than tacking from one spaghetti-against-the-wall experiment to the next.

Do I read massive business plans?  No.  Do I expect the companies who seek my help to have planned? Yes!

So while Mr. Halligan may be right that no one reads a business plan, you’ll be dead in the water if you interpret his remarks to mean you needn’t plan at all.

Social Media Campaign managed by Spredfast

Posted: by chrisshipley on November 11th, 2009 | 3 Comments »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Observations, Social Media

Earlier this year, at a TIEcon panel on the business of social media, I spoke about social media as an analytics machine.  Millions upon millions of people announcing what they had done, what they are doing, what they plan to do.  The Social Web is an observation tower for human behavior.

The highest tower among many is Twitter, yet when I asked Twitter’s VP of Business Operations Santosh Jayaram how many developers were working on analytics he mumbled, “We have a couple of guys looking at it.”  No doubt, Twitter has its hands full just keeping the lights on, but folks – analytics is the value of Twitter.

I’ve beaten this drum in dozens of conversations throughout the summer yet the focus always comes back to things like social graphs and crowd marketing.

Then, today, a guy with a bigger drum made a bang at Defrag. Eric Marcoullier, CEO of Gnip, Inc., has a booming voice and a big personality, and his brief talk this morning — ‘The business world doesn’t give a shit about your lifestream app” — resonated throughout the room.  Fundamentally, Eric argued, social media (for business) needs to “make the leap from marketing to business intelligence.”

Exactly.

Business is beginning to pay a lot more attention to Twitter and other social media as a megaphone and a listening post, and that’s a start.  We now have ample examples of small businesses announcing that the donuts are fresh from the oven and large companies responding to disgruntled customers to convince businesses of any size that there is something to this social media thing.

Typically and perhaps understandably, these now-enlightened companies gravitate toward selling and marketing.  Yet they are missing the big opportunity of social media by not taking the further step to understand the meaning behind the collective voice.

These organizations need a new set of tools and new approaches to data to gain that insight.  Fellow Defrag attendee  Nathan Gilliatt, whose practice is focused on working with corporate clients to bring them meaning to social data, described this as the need to break down the “measurement silos” to blend social media into business intelligence.

Indeed, social analytics brings a deeper understanding to customer engagement. It allows organizations to create the right product, drive the right relationships, structure a more responsive organization, and – yes – market and sell.

Most importantly, as Eric put it this morning, it allows business to “move beyond data and seek meaning.”

Posted: by chrisshipley on November 4th, 2009 | 1 Comment »

Categorized: Business Models, Chris Shipley, Startups

In a post written a couple days ago, I took a poke at “free” business models and cited the success of WatchDox launching its  secure file-sharing service with a premium price tag.

In that post, I wrote:

At best, free is a marketing strategy, although typically not a well understood one.

Having said that, I thought it reasonable that I give an example where I think “free” makes a lot of business sense. That example came to me as I was working with Guidewire Group client MyOwnRealEstate.com on its pricing model.

For those of you who missed the company’s product launch at DEMOfall, MyOwnRealEstate is a property management and tenant communications platform offered as a Web-based service.  The product is aimed at the sweet spot of professional rental property owners with 3 to 50 units under management.  For those customers, M.O.R.E. charges a modest per-unit-per-month price that is easily absorbed into the monthly rent.

But what about the million-plus property owners who are renting the other side of their duplex or leasing a second home?  They account for a significant portion of America’s housing stock, but frankly they are the hard-to-find customers who would cost so much to reach that they’d not prove profitable until well into the second or third year of service, a contract term they’d not likely sign on to.

My advice to the company was a seeming contradiction to my “free isn’t a business model” campaign: give them the software for free.  If you own or manage two or fewer rental units, you can use myownrealestate.com at no cost.

The reasoning: While some of these customers might pay – if you could find and market to them, most would not.  However, each of these units touches a few tenants who will be introduced to the product and who may begin to ask about it when they move on to their next rental.  It’s a slow word of mouth campaign, but it is some value exchange.  Moreover, real estate professionals talk and a few champions using the service will begin to lift page rankings and otherwise build awareness of the service within the real estate community.  And, once in a while, little real estate moguls become bigger real estate tycoons, taking their practices and tools along with them.

It’s small stakes, to be sure, but stakes easily given away because the marginal cost of serving these customers is very low and the price of capturing them is extraordinarily high.

Meanwhile, the customers with the incentive and the cash to pay for the service receive the equivalent of a modest discount (first two units manged are free).  It’s a win all the way around.

Posted: by chrisshipley on November 3rd, 2009 | No Comments »

Categorized: Chris Shipley, Observations, Startups

I started my day at SAP Labs in Palo Alto moderating a panel discussion about “Enabling Innovation: How does it happen? What’s the secret sauce?”  The room was filled with the managing directors of SAP Labs worldwide and their invited guests, the vast majority of them representing multi-billion dollar global businesses that are challenged, presumably, by the task of continual innovation.

The panel was representative of the of the Silicon Valley ecosystem:

  • Kimber Lockhart and Jeff Seibert, co-founders of Increo Solutions (the entrepreneurs)
  • Mark Radcliffe, partner at DLA Piper (the lawyer)
  • Dan Pistone, SR VP for tech banking at Bridge Bank (the banker)
  • Gamiel Gran, VP Business Development at Sierra Ventures (the VC)
  • and me (the analyst)

We started the conversation by level setting around the idea of innovation itself.  I usually argue that the word “innovation” is so easily tossed off that it has lost its meaning.  Everybody is “innovative,” even when we can’t be sure how or why.   I contend that innovation is what someone will buy.  Jeff’s definition is even better:  “delivering creativity to end users.”

As this part of the conversation unfolded, though, it became clear that innovation isn’t  a thing; it’s a process. Innovation doesn’t just happen.  It’s exercised and deliberate.  And it that regard, it also may well be a culture, a state of mind, a core value of an individual or organization.

So what marks an innovative company?  Surely, the list is longer than that which we discussed in 45 minutes this morning  (and I invite your additions to the list in the comments, please).  Our conversation kept coming back to these four ideas:

  1. Vet ideas early and often. Jeff and Kimber told the story of founding Increo as a process of testing ideas.  Did they dig the idea?  Did it resonate after the initial excitement wore off?  Did other people see value in it?  Brain storming twice a week helped the vet countless “incredibly great bad ideas.”
  2. Try something. Feedback is critical and there’s no better way to get feedback than to put something – anything – out for response. Again from the Increo founding story: “We weren’t coming up with any great ideas for a business, so we decided to just build an idea sharing site,” Jeff said.  The site morphed into an enterprise idea bank which morphed again into the Increo document collaboration platform, acquired by Box.net in August.
  3. Embrace failure, fail fast. Mark Radcliff was quick to point out that Silicon Valley is distinct from other technology ecosystems in its acceptance of failure, almost as a price of entry for innovation.  You can imagine that a roomful of corporate lieutenants would be loathe to celebrate failure with their management.  And frankly, I think “fail fast” is one of those Valley pablums that lose their meaning in bad practice.  Rather than failing fast, companies need to learn to fail smart.  They need to understand what went wrong and why, do it quickly, reset, and try again.
  4. Balance innovation and invention. As “delivered creativity,” Innovation implies an immediacy with the customer.  That’s great for solving today’s business problems, but may leave a large company like SAP flat footed in the long term if they don’t also engage in primary research on the path to invention.