<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitsville</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guidewiregroup.com/2010/01/twitsville/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guidewiregroup.com/2010/01/twitsville/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://guidewiregroup.com/2010/01/twitsville/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Faulkner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guidewiregroup.com/?p=1104#comment-864</guid>
		<description>I agree with you completely Louis and Carla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you completely Louis and Carla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlacthompson</title>
		<link>http://guidewiregroup.com/2010/01/twitsville/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>carlacthompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guidewiregroup.com/?p=1104#comment-860</guid>
		<description>Louis - it&#039;s definitely the latter. Though I LOVE that you used to read Ms. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis &#8211; it&#8217;s definitely the latter. Though I LOVE that you used to read Ms. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Gray</title>
		<link>http://guidewiregroup.com/2010/01/twitsville/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guidewiregroup.com/?p=1104#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Being smart generally makes you attractive. Being attractive does not generally make you smart.

One would assume that some of these mags are run by smart women, right? Would they not want to highlight their own, or is there a fear of becoming a dry Ms. Magazine clone? (BTW - I used to love that magazine in college, but haven&#039;t read it in a while)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being smart generally makes you attractive. Being attractive does not generally make you smart.</p>
<p>One would assume that some of these mags are run by smart women, right? Would they not want to highlight their own, or is there a fear of becoming a dry Ms. Magazine clone? (BTW &#8211; I used to love that magazine in college, but haven&#8217;t read it in a while)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
